<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The devil is in the details: a review of Backpack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/</link>
	<description>my god, it's full of stars</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bos89.nl &#187; Journey to a new design</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-2031</link>
		<dc:creator>Bos89.nl &#187; Journey to a new design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 21:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/journal/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-2031</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Curiously this theme is not using any of that, no tabs, no drop-down menus, no ajax. Not to say it won&#8217;t be there in the future -especially the ajax search is very nice- but for now I&#8217;ll do without. I really got inspired by Kyle Neath and his &#8216;the devil is in the details&#8216; article on backpack. He calls his designs &#8216;obsessively symmetric and proportional&#8217; and I like that a lot. I also liked overlapping forms with transparency for some time already but that&#8217;s not really supported until CSS3 becomes common. Now I found how to do it with background images. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Curiously this theme is not using any of that, no tabs, no drop-down menus, no ajax. Not to say it won&#8217;t be there in the future -especially the ajax search is very nice- but for now I&#8217;ll do without. I really got inspired by Kyle Neath and his &#8216;the devil is in the details&#8216; article on backpack. He calls his designs &#8216;obsessively symmetric and proportional&#8217; and I like that a lot. I also liked overlapping forms with transparency for some time already but that&#8217;s not really supported until CSS3 becomes common. Now I found how to do it with background images. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can you justify design decisions? &#187; Project Syndicate</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-1962</link>
		<dc:creator>Can you justify design decisions? &#187; Project Syndicate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 06:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/journal/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-1962</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] The Devil is in the Details [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Devil is in the Details [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 05:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/journal/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-747</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And here I expected their answer to be: &lt;a href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/archives2/it_just_doesnt_matter.php" title="No really, it doesn't." rel="nofollow"&gt;It just doesn't matter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here I expected their answer to be: <a href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/archives2/it_just_doesnt_matter.php" title="No really, it doesn't." rel="nofollow">It just doesn&#8217;t matter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/journal/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-670</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hear you Kyle - I dont agree that the 37signals are "top-notch" in the sence of visual experience... They are top-notch in user experience - dont get me wrong, I too love their so simple approach to almost every situation possible... &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Im not quite sure how they pride themselfes, I have though noted that they have been open about their choice of incossistency when made sence...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Backpack is not an application for me, something about it that really annoys me - but cannot quite put my finger on it... Basecamp on the other hand - I love that... &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well Im not a graphical designer - Im just a programmer, loving their Rails ;) ...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You wrote: "why not take it that extra few inches to perfection?"
It could be a matter of priorities... To quote the signals: "Release half a product not a half arsed product"...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you Kyle - I dont agree that the 37signals are &#8220;top-notch&#8221; in the sence of visual experience&#8230; They are top-notch in user experience - dont get me wrong, I too love their so simple approach to almost every situation possible&#8230; </p>
<p>Im not quite sure how they pride themselfes, I have though noted that they have been open about their choice of incossistency when made sence&#8230;</p>
<p>Backpack is not an application for me, something about it that really annoys me - but cannot quite put my finger on it&#8230; Basecamp on the other hand - I love that&#8230; </p>
<p>Well Im not a graphical designer - Im just a programmer, loving their Rails ;) &#8230;</p>
<p>You wrote: &#8220;why not take it that extra few inches to perfection?&#8221;<br />
It could be a matter of priorities&#8230; To quote the signals: &#8220;Release half a product not a half arsed product&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil D'Souza</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil D'Souza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/journal/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-668</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bravo. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Detail is of utmost importance. Web designers nowadays don't conform to the rules used in print. Newspapers/Magazines are so fixed with no play at all. They look good. Why can't websites be the same? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With CSS it is possible, only no one wants to get too detailed into it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I myself am too lazy to see that CSS works. Still trying. ;-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Bravo. </b></p>
<p>Detail is of utmost importance. Web designers nowadays don&#8217;t conform to the rules used in print. Newspapers/Magazines are so fixed with no play at all. They look good. Why can&#8217;t websites be the same? </p>
<p>With CSS it is possible, only no one wants to get too detailed into it.</p>
<p>I myself am too lazy to see that CSS works. Still trying. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 05:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/journal/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-667</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, before we all burn in the seventh ring of grammar hell, perhaps I &lt;em&gt;ought&lt;/em&gt; (or maybe I &lt;em&gt;might&lt;/em&gt;) to change that sentence :) It's come to my attention recently that statments like "here's those beers you asked for" are very California native.  The English language is a cruel beast sometimes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, before we all burn in the seventh ring of grammar hell, perhaps I <em>ought</em> (or maybe I <em>might</em>) to change that sentence :) It&#8217;s come to my attention recently that statments like &#8220;here&#8217;s those beers you asked for&#8221; are very California native.  The English language is a cruel beast sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabsteen</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>rabsteen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 05:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/journal/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-666</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;since we're on the subject of grammar, if it is &lt;strong&gt;obvious&lt;/strong&gt; that Kyle is a stickler for details, why did you use &lt;em&gt;'might'&lt;/em&gt; which implies probability rather than &lt;em&gt;'ought'&lt;/em&gt; which corresponds with your established fact?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since we&#8217;re on the subject of grammar, if it is <strong>obvious</strong> that Kyle is a stickler for details, why did you use <em>&#8216;might&#8217;</em> which implies probability rather than <em>&#8216;ought&#8217;</em> which corresponds with your established fact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt @ 37signals</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt @ 37signals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/journal/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-663</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Kyle. We appreciate the feedback. There's always room for improvement. We're constantly working to improve Backpack (and our other products) and we'll keep your comments in mind.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And since you're obviously a stickler for details, I thought you might want to know there's a grammatical error in the links area above your comments bar: You want "here are some links" as opposed to "here's some links." ; )&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kyle. We appreciate the feedback. There&#8217;s always room for improvement. We&#8217;re constantly working to improve Backpack (and our other products) and we&#8217;ll keep your comments in mind.</p>
<p>And since you&#8217;re obviously a stickler for details, I thought you might want to know there&#8217;s a grammatical error in the links area above your comments bar: You want &#8220;here are some links&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;here&#8217;s some links.&#8221; ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/journal/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-654</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dan:&lt;/strong&gt; Actually Jason prides himself in being an "aesthetic" designer as well (as well he should). In general, the designs coming from 37s are top-notch, hence the reason I picked on them in the first place.  The details that I point out are not saying the design of backpack is horrid, but rather it's so close to being perfect: why not take it that extra few inches to perfection?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mike:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;I just shot this over to Jason so we?ll see what he thinks ;)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No worries, I've seen a few referrrers from 37s.campfirenow.com... hmm, I wonder what that could be? :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dan:</strong> Actually Jason prides himself in being an &#8220;aesthetic&#8221; designer as well (as well he should). In general, the designs coming from 37s are top-notch, hence the reason I picked on them in the first place.  The details that I point out are not saying the design of backpack is horrid, but rather it&#8217;s so close to being perfect: why not take it that extra few inches to perfection?</p>
<p><strong>Mike:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>I just shot this over to Jason so we?ll see what he thinks ;)</p></blockquote>
<p>No worries, I&#8217;ve seen a few referrrers from 37s.campfirenow.com&#8230; hmm, I wonder what that could be? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/journal/design/the-devil-is-in-the-details-a-review-of-backpack/#comment-653</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Aesthetics are a part of the user experience. Check out Don Norman's research on emotional design to learn a bit more. My personal feeling is that there is a belief out there that aesthetics and efficiency or quality user experience are incompatible. That's just being lazy, or having a blind eye period.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aesthetics are a part of the user experience. Check out Don Norman&#8217;s research on emotional design to learn a bit more. My personal feeling is that there is a belief out there that aesthetics and efficiency or quality user experience are incompatible. That&#8217;s just being lazy, or having a blind eye period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.371 seconds -->
