<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The best music of 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/music/the-best-music-of-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/music/the-best-music-of-2005/</link>
	<description>my god, it's full of stars</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/music/the-best-music-of-2005/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/?p=100#comment-457</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oooh, missed a couple of the best (in my opinion, obviously) from '05. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Firstly, being from England, I'd recommend the Arctic Monkeys. Not stunning, but upbeat and a slightly more enjoyable and raw sound than, oh, QoTSA. And, while &lt;em&gt;Songs for the Deaf&lt;/em&gt; is alright, too many of the songs are just half-formed ideas and fillers. I mean, any album that puts 20 seconds of Spanish radio-promo is surely doing something wierd. Then there's the Strokes' new album, &lt;em&gt;First Impressions of Earth&lt;/em&gt;, which, while it was only released in December, moves further from the failure of &lt;em&gt;Room on Fire&lt;/em&gt;. Worth a listen. Then there's also Louis XIV's self-titled album, which is truly wonderful - sexy but oh-so-rough-on-the-edges - is placed second on my all-time most listened to list. Which would indicate something decent.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Finally - José Gonzalez re-released 2004's &lt;em&gt;Veneer&lt;/em&gt;, which is a sublime album, and by far my most loved and listened to album of 2005. While it may be too melow for some people, it has a certain beauty that stands up to "Repeat-One".&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, missed a couple of the best (in my opinion, obviously) from &#8216;05. </p>
<p>Firstly, being from England, I&#8217;d recommend the Arctic Monkeys. Not stunning, but upbeat and a slightly more enjoyable and raw sound than, oh, QoTSA. And, while <em>Songs for the Deaf</em> is alright, too many of the songs are just half-formed ideas and fillers. I mean, any album that puts 20 seconds of Spanish radio-promo is surely doing something wierd. Then there&#8217;s the Strokes&#8217; new album, <em>First Impressions of Earth</em>, which, while it was only released in December, moves further from the failure of <em>Room on Fire</em>. Worth a listen. Then there&#8217;s also Louis XIV&#8217;s self-titled album, which is truly wonderful - sexy but oh-so-rough-on-the-edges - is placed second on my all-time most listened to list. Which would indicate something decent.</p>
<p>Finally - José Gonzalez re-released 2004&#8217;s <em>Veneer</em>, which is a sublime album, and by far my most loved and listened to album of 2005. While it may be too melow for some people, it has a certain beauty that stands up to &#8220;Repeat-One&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Schembri</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/music/the-best-music-of-2005/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Schembri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 06:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/?p=100#comment-349</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ah you guys are just to grumpy nowadays. I tested everyone out on iTunes and just loved every single &lt;strong&gt;ALBUM&lt;/strong&gt;. Hey what can i say though? Great minds think a like.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I ended up downloading, i mean &lt;em&gt;coughcough&lt;/em&gt; buying most of your list there. Great way to start off the new school semester.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah you guys are just to grumpy nowadays. I tested everyone out on iTunes and just loved every single <strong>ALBUM</strong>. Hey what can i say though? Great minds think a like.</p>
<p>I ended up downloading, i mean <em>coughcough</em> buying most of your list there. Great way to start off the new school semester.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddy Bones</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/music/the-best-music-of-2005/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddy Bones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/?p=100#comment-348</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Eve - we call them records because they've been recorded.  The black discs from the seventies (and thereafter) are called vinyls.  And I think Kyle's publishing this nonsense because it really isn't that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kyle - What, no OAR?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eve - we call them records because they&#8217;ve been recorded.  The black discs from the seventies (and thereafter) are called vinyls.  And I think Kyle&#8217;s publishing this nonsense because it really isn&#8217;t that.</p>
<p>Kyle - What, no OAR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/music/the-best-music-of-2005/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/?p=100#comment-347</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Pretty good list, the only ones I really don't like are Queens of the Stone Age and Underoath.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty good list, the only ones I really don&#8217;t like are Queens of the Stone Age and Underoath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eve</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/music/the-best-music-of-2005/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/?p=100#comment-346</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have never heard of any of these albums(I dunno why you call them records, we're not from the seventies!) so I dunno why you are publishing this nonsense. Feel free to post a comment in my blog - decent - if you feel like it. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never heard of any of these albums(I dunno why you call them records, we&#8217;re not from the seventies!) so I dunno why you are publishing this nonsense. Feel free to post a comment in my blog - decent - if you feel like it. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ionfish &#183; Top 5 of 2005</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/music/the-best-music-of-2005/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>ionfish &#183; Top 5 of 2005</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/?p=100#comment-345</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Scary Go Round&#8217;s indefatigable author shares his annual list of favourites with us.
 Warpspire: The best music of 2005. 9rules comrade Kyle Neath lists the best things he&#38; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scary Go Round&#8217;s indefatigable author shares his annual list of favourites with us.<br />
 Warpspire: The best music of 2005. 9rules comrade Kyle Neath lists the best things he&amp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.349 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
