Comments on: 9/11 and Pearl Harbor: Do we even care anymore?

By: Androit

Androit — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:12:55 +0000

Response to Brent ...

Because of people like you, your Government has literally got away with murder.

Your Government love people like yourself, who happily digest any rubbish that the Media feeds to the Masses (ie: You). You are also totally unable to judge & analyse the situation without bias because you are so wrapped up in the American Flag that you think that your Government can do no wrong.

And just because there are people out there who believe it was the US Government / 'an inside job' that caused 9/11, it does NOT mean we are disrespecting The Dead. It was a terrible loss of life. There are just many people out there who would like the TRUTH! Big Difference there mate! You need to start thinking with your head, and not your heart on this one.

Economics is the big reason for 9/11, like it was in WW2. Hypothetically, if the Germans / Russians won the War, and all of Europe started speaking Russian or German, how long would it of been before the USA was financially crippled??? Considering the amount of trade between the US and Europe, I think it was in the US interests to offer some support to the War effort. Don't you?

And with 9/11. It's odd how 'The business of War' has become the single biggest money spinner in the US. And with the current housing & car market crash, your Government would be totally screwed if it wasn't for the current Wars your country are fighting.

By: Dave

Dave — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:54:17 +0000

And if this actually insulted you, you have problems.

The writer did not attack veterans or soldiers, he merely questioned the actions of our corrupt government.

I have the utmost respect for all soldiers, but I can still feel that and believe our government is not as innocent as it claims.

By: Dave

Dave — Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:51:26 +0000

Haha, Brent. Man, that was some good stuff.

You talk about wisdom and maturity, yet you're the one calling people "cunts" and whatnot.

If you look at the FACTS about 9/11, you know, actually research what actually happened that day, you'll find they all point to the government's involvement.

It saddens me that we share this country with people like you...

Hopefully one day you'll grow up and understand ignorance is a flaw. (Though I wouldn't bet on it.)

By: derrick

derrick — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:03:23 +0000

I stopped reading the comments on this post after Brent indicated with age comes wisdom and whatnot. Presumably Brent is an older bloke (though I am speculating). Yet his comments have the most immature vitriol of this page. Hypocritical at the LEAST. Moreover, naivete can go both ways too, affecting any age range and any ideology. I do hope one day this species evolves such that such emotionalism no longer afflicts us.

For the record, I'm in my mid-30s.

PS Kyle, I've not noticed a right-wing bent to the History Channel; actually the opposite. I wouldn't expect to see the History Channel's frank treatment of Christianity from a right-wing source, for example.

By: just wondering

just wondering — Fri, 30 May 2008 17:18:55 +0000

I am only able to find one glaring connection between Pearl Harbor and 911. That connection is actually a person and the company he founded. The founder of CDI Controlled Demolition Inc was stationed in PH just before the attacks in 1941. CDI Controlled Demolition Inc over the next 60 years became the US military’s and governments most clandestine building and bridge demolition and detonation company. What they were doing at the Murrah Building in 1995 before the explosion has never been answered. And what they were doing inside the World Trade Centers on Sat. Sept 8th and Sun Sept 9th 2001 has also never been answered. Keep in mind that it was CDI who was paid Billions to remove and destroy all buildingsmaterial from OKCity in 95′ as well as the WTC’s in 2001. No man made explosive testing was ever allowed and was actually deemed illegal to do by the Bush administration. CDI’s name also seems to pop up with regards to the levee detonation 2 days after Katrina left New Orleans. The precise detonation of the levees is so well thought in terms of massive destruction that it could never have been done by a rouge bardge like the Bush administration claims. (It became illegal to test the material underneath the ships at Pearl Harbor for man made explosives and thus no test has ever been conducted)

Ask this: If you think that 911 was an inside job or a controlled demolition…..why is it that not one group or truth organization has then ever asked….then who could have done the detonation? Not one single “truth group”, scientist, or researcher such as Jones, Griffin or anyone has ever asked that question. Why?

By: opemormigmeta

opemormigmeta — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:45:34 +0000

By: Richard Neva

Richard Neva — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:28:54 +0000

This is for “Brent” the guy that thinks dying for the flag makes it all good. He is unfortunately the vocal spokesperson for a majority of Americans. All it takes is one family member to die in war to make believers out of the whole family. This is the way fascist governments like our own can keep a hold on us and prevent change. I really would love to swear at Brent and use his form of argument but it will not change his mind. He has been duped by the media and fact that his family has been murdered in war. Get a life Brent and do some research! By the way, I am a Communist! Damn proud of it too!

By: William

William — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:43:03 +0000

I think Kyles point was to point out Japan didn’t attack the U.S. just because they felt like it.

By: Casas rurales

Casas rurales — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:16:02 +0000

I think mass destruction is a big error, but at the time seem Countries don’t think another question that money. People have to learn live in peace without considering the races and political ideologies

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:39:45 +0000

Hrmm, I don’t know how old this is, since some talk seems shortly post 9/11 and some talks of V for Vendetta, pretty recent.

Anyway, I just thought I’d point out that we were doing those things against Japan because we felt we had to do SOMETHING, even if we couldn’t afford war. Japan was part of the axis, being totally neutral would be insanity. But it hardly justifies a surprise attack.

I’m always surprised when people choose to bend over backwards to justify something, especially by suggesting an elaborate plot to turn public opinion by allowing mass destruction. Sure, it could happen, but why do people take absolutely miniscule evidence and assume the worst. I doubt you would want to be treated that way.