Comments on: 9/11 and Pearl Harbor: Do we even care anymore?

By: just wondering

just wondering — Fri, 30 May 2008 17:18:55 +0000

I am only able to find one glaring connection between Pearl Harbor and 911. That connection is actually a person and the company he founded. The founder of CDI Controlled Demolition Inc was stationed in PH just before the attacks in 1941. CDI Controlled Demolition Inc over the next 60 years became the US military’s and governments most clandestine building and bridge demolition and detonation company. What they were doing at the Murrah Building in 1995 before the explosion has never been answered. And what they were doing inside the World Trade Centers on Sat. Sept 8th and Sun Sept 9th 2001 has also never been answered. Keep in mind that it was CDI who was paid Billions to remove and destroy all buildingsmaterial from OKCity in 95′ as well as the WTC’s in 2001. No man made explosive testing was ever allowed and was actually deemed illegal to do by the Bush administration. CDI’s name also seems to pop up with regards to the levee detonation 2 days after Katrina left New Orleans. The precise detonation of the levees is so well thought in terms of massive destruction that it could never have been done by a rouge bardge like the Bush administration claims. (It became illegal to test the material underneath the ships at Pearl Harbor for man made explosives and thus no test has ever been conducted)

Ask this: If you think that 911 was an inside job or a controlled demolition…..why is it that not one group or truth organization has then ever asked….then who could have done the detonation? Not one single “truth group”, scientist, or researcher such as Jones, Griffin or anyone has ever asked that question. Why?

By: opemormigmeta

opemormigmeta — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:45:34 +0000

By: Richard Neva

Richard Neva — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:28:54 +0000

This is for “Brent” the guy that thinks dying for the flag makes it all good. He is unfortunately the vocal spokesperson for a majority of Americans. All it takes is one family member to die in war to make believers out of the whole family. This is the way fascist governments like our own can keep a hold on us and prevent change. I really would love to swear at Brent and use his form of argument but it will not change his mind. He has been duped by the media and fact that his family has been murdered in war. Get a life Brent and do some research! By the way, I am a Communist! Damn proud of it too!

By: William

William — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:43:03 +0000

I think Kyles point was to point out Japan didn’t attack the U.S. just because they felt like it.

By: Casas rurales

Casas rurales — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:16:02 +0000

I think mass destruction is a big error, but at the time seem Countries don’t think another question that money. People have to learn live in peace without considering the races and political ideologies

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:39:45 +0000

Hrmm, I don’t know how old this is, since some talk seems shortly post 9/11 and some talks of V for Vendetta, pretty recent.

Anyway, I just thought I’d point out that we were doing those things against Japan because we felt we had to do SOMETHING, even if we couldn’t afford war. Japan was part of the axis, being totally neutral would be insanity. But it hardly justifies a surprise attack.

I’m always surprised when people choose to bend over backwards to justify something, especially by suggesting an elaborate plot to turn public opinion by allowing mass destruction. Sure, it could happen, but why do people take absolutely miniscule evidence and assume the worst. I doubt you would want to be treated that way.

By: Max_Normal

Max_Normal — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:59:28 +0000

Yeah, great idea. Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, Bush invaded because his dad was critised for not finishing the war in Desert Storm. It had nothing to do with thousands of dead bankers or brave New York firemen or with Al Quaeda.
Now Irans nuclear programme has accelerated because they are scared of the west, civil war and thousand upon thousands of people better than “brent” and “retread” dead. The whole Middle East destabilised, fundamentalist christian wankers and fundamentalist muslim cunts being converted all over the world BEGGING for armageddon because their imaginary fuckhead prophets say it is a good idea, Murdered innocent Spaniards and Londoners who probably marched to protest about the OBVIOUSLY stupid war in the first place.

All because of hateful, moronic, religious, right-wing americans with the presence of mind of a dogs cock supported their war because the american army is too retarded and shit to capture a lone Saudi Arabian hiding in a cave in Afganistan and therefore had to find a scapegoat elsewhere regardless of the consequences.

In the wake of all that american hate, epic stupidy and racist evil, the tragedy of the innocent lives lost on 9/11 seems utterly, utterly, utterly insignificant to the rest of the world now, and always will do.

By: retread

retread — Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:18:06 +0000

Well yeah, dipshit. Of course we were “attacking” Japan with sanctions etc. It was an attempt at a non-military solution to Japanese aggression. Isn’t that what you leftards prefer to open war?

Criminy.

By: wade

wade — Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:24:20 +0000

Response to Brent ..

Hmm don't know where to begin .. come on Brent be a little self-critical mate .. you have made your arguments in a violent, personal and in a disrespectable way .. no need to argue that way mate .. perhaps this is indicative of your mental intellect?

By the way, has war ever solved anything? Recently, not judging by Iraq .. definitely not .. and do get your facts correct, Sadam was put their by the US government; the bugger was a US puppet .. US government supported him when they needed him for US interests (in 70's and the 80's) then ditched the sod when they had enough of him and when he invaded Kuwait .. remember, mr intellectual mate, Kuwait was part of Iraq before the Brits separated the country .. so was it a real invasion and a real big deal for Kuwaitâ€™s freedom or for oil? but that's another story .. just imagine Hawaii or New York belonging to USA and then one day USA gets invaded by a powerful country and the occupiers decide to separate these two states from whole of America and created two new countries as happened with Kuwait, uae etc ..what would happen then? (I know it won't happen because America is too powerful, but for theoretical point of view, lets use this analogy to keep it simple for you to understand, just in case).

when arguing, please, please keep personal remarks out as this is really childish and shows your insecurity towards the so-called facts .. As with Koreas and Vietnam .. did America really fought a war to free the people? Hmmm China is communist how come no war happened there? and why would America end the war in Nam if it was fighting for the moral right of the people? If this were the case, then the war would have not ended at all until such moral right was fulfilled .. Very fishy mate .. there is more meat to the story than meets the eye .. hope you're not confused ..

Have fun and remember: truth always comes out .. may take time, but shows its way eventually .. just watch and see about Bush's stuff come out ..

Have fun mate .. (yeah I' British-American in case you didn't know)

Nice one Kyle .. keep it dude

Wade

By: Glenn

Glenn — Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:30:15 +0000

Hrmm, I don't know how old this is, since some talk seems shortly post 9/11 and some talks of V for Vendetta, pretty recent.

Anyway, I just thought I'd point out that we were doing those things against Japan because we felt we had to do SOMETHING, even if we couldn't afford war. Japan was part of the axis, being totally neutral would be insanity. But it hardly justifies a surprise attack.

I'm always surprised when people choose to bend over backwards to justify something, especially by suggesting an elaborate plot to turn public opinion by allowing mass destruction. Sure, it could happen, but why do people take absolutely miniscule evidence and assume the worst. I doubt you would want to be treated that way.