<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s new referral system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/web-publishing/googles-new-referral-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/web-publishing/googles-new-referral-system/</link>
	<description>my god, it's full of stars</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Marcc</title>
		<link>http://warpspire.com/tipsresources/web-publishing/googles-new-referral-system/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Marcc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warpspire.com/journal/web-publishing/googles-new-referral-system/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Building a browser wouldn't be by any means the lowest income generating product Google has undertaken. Stupid as it may sound, Google is always looking for more hype, publicity, and a larger customer base. I think we may see Firefox being turned into the Google browser, with built in gmail (offline and online email browsing?), google maps, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Building a browser wouldn&#8217;t be by any means the lowest income generating product Google has undertaken. Stupid as it may sound, Google is always looking for more hype, publicity, and a larger customer base. I think we may see Firefox being turned into the Google browser, with built in gmail (offline and online email browsing?), google maps, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.180 seconds -->
